News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by indigo945 on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @10:48AM (#38085684)
My problem with the argument is not that it's anti-feminist, it is that it's a broad-swath argument that could be levied against any number of beliefs, and the author deliberately chose to wield it only and exclusively against feminist and anti-racist positions.

I made that quite clear in my original comment by suggesting several conservative "luxury beliefs" that I believe the author would have to criticize on the same grounds, but failed to do so. This is not "deflection", it's showing that the article employs double standards and is thus intellectually dishonest.

The "predictable" part, in my estimation, is that this kind of argument would be used by a right-wing author. To be saying the thing by saying it, conservative cultural critics, when measuring liberal discourse, are incapable of coming up with a bar that they themselves don't trip over.

Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by suoduandao3 on Thursday November 09, 2023 @11:20AM (#38207019)
Do you have a theory why left-wing authors don't discuss luxury beliefs?
Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by indigo945 on Thursday November 16, 2023 @05:46AM (#38287977)
I think they do. It's just, it's so blatantly obvious that "single-payer healthcare is too expensive" and "there's no problem with police violence toward black people in particular" are "luxury beliefs" (in the sense that you can only afford to hold them if you're not directly affected by them) that there's no need to spell it out. (This point is sometimes spelled out when it comes to discussions on race and gender -- that's what "privilege" means. That "privilege" isn't brought up as much when it comes to economic/class issues speaks to the state of class warfare in the US.)