News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by thfuran on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @08:26AM (#38083693)
>it is only here as an argument against liberal ideas that he doesn't like, and as such it's entirely driven by bad faith.

Are you suggesting that it is inherently bad faith to argue against a position that one doesn't like?

Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by philwelch on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @09:36AM (#38084599)
No, he’s saying it’s inherently bad faith to be conservative.
Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by littlestymaar on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @10:11AM (#38085114)
No, I actually read more conservatives than I do read from people who share my opinions because bad faith annoys me even more when it's done from my side.

And there are bunch of conservatives that are even pleasant to read even though I don't have much in common with them.

You can have different opinions and still argue in good faith.

Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by philwelch on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @10:13AM (#38085162)
David French doesn’t count.
Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by catlover76 on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @02:27PM (#38089251)
Why not?
Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by philwelch on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @06:32AM (#38096557)
David French is a compulsive contrarian and has ended up in a position where virtually all of his writing consists of attacks against conservatives written for liberal audiences. He’s not nearly as bad as Bill Kristol or Max Boot in this regard but he’s not taken seriously by other conservatives anymore.
Re:Luxury Beliefs Are Status Symbols by littlestymaar on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @09:42AM (#38084686)
No, but if you disguise your criticism as sociological analysis while hiding under the rug the obvious parts of the analysis that wouldn't fit your narrative, then it's fair to say that's bad faith.