German court declares Do Not Track to be legally binding

Re:German court declares Do Not Track to be legally binding by psd1 on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @06:46AM (#38082776)

Thank you for being only the second rational argument I've seen in favour of Brexit. The other one was around the inefficiency (~= horse-trading ~= corruption) of divvying up project spending.

There are counter-arguments but I see no need to thrash them out. It's nice just to see some fucking thought.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:German court declares Do Not Track to be legally binding by wirrbel on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @07:40AM (#38083266)

Surely British case law isn’t at all lacking surprising court decisions

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:German court declares Do Not Track to be legally binding by MarcusE1W on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @08:52AM (#38084038)

I am glad the UK governments of the recent decade have such a strong stand against corruption, out of their deeply ingrained principles. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If that were the only reason (nobody said it was) then the UK had to leave the UK immediately.

[ Parent | on HN ]