News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced c... by dansalvato on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @02:55AM (#38081124)
I think your last paragraph sounds about right. The Max is a compromise on battery life for those who want the absolute most possible performance, but I think Apple is seeing a much wider audience get the Pro chip. Anecdotally, whenever I see a tech person mention their Apple silicon device, it's almost always a Pro chip. I'm sure only a small fraction of that user base is hitting all cores with a full load on a regular basis, but a majority are certainly enjoying a killer battery life.
Re:Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced c... by runeks on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @05:23AM (#38082130)
I chose the M1 Max over the M1 Pro only to get 32GB RAM. I couldn’t care less about the GPU (which makes it annoying to have to pay for it).
Re:Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced c... by lionello on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @09:06AM (#38084235)
I have an M1 Pro with 32GB
Re:Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced c... by jwr on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @05:53AM (#38082368)
I'll be buying the Max this year, upgrading from an M1 Pro. The Max actually started making sense, because there are more performance cores and memory bandwidth is bigger. I don't much care about GPU: I wish Fusion 360 ran faster, but Autodesk doesn't seem to care much about Mac performance. What I do care about is CPU for Clojure development work, and for that the new Max actually makes sense.

In the M1 generation there was no benefit from going from Pro to the Max.