News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced c... by rewmie on Monday October 30, 2023 @09:50PM (#38079106)
> Depends. Is it faster?

The devil tends to be in the details. More precisely, in the benchmark details. I think Apple provided none other than the marketing blurb. In the meantime, embarrassingly parallel applications do benefit from having more performant cores.

Re:Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced c... by photonerd on Monday October 30, 2023 @10:56PM (#38079688)
oh absolutely, I can't wait to see the benchmarks. Per the (non-numerical data) benchmarks in the video tho - it is faster. So... until other evidence presents itself, that's what we have to go on.
Re:Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced c... by grupthink on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @02:01AM (#38080844)
Heh, I recall seeing many posts arguing against benchmarks when all Macs equipped with an M2/8GB/256GB SSD scored much, much lower than the M1/8GB/256GB SSD. People said the synthetic benchmarks were not representative of real world use and you'd never notice the difference. 'Twas a battle of the optimists, pessimists, and realists. In reality, 'twas just Apple cutting costs in their newer product.
Re:Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced c... by rewmie on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @05:50AM (#38082339)
> Heh, I recall seeing many posts arguing against benchmarks (...)

It's one thing to argue that some real-world data might not be representative all on itself.

It's an entirely different thing to present no proof at all, and just claim "trust me, bro" on marketing brochures.