Re:Yann LeCun on how lobbying for AI regulation is abused
by andy99 on Sunday October 29, 2023 @05:32PM
(#38063038)
It's a war on general purpose computing.
Re:Yann LeCun on how lobbying for AI regulation is abused
by Vecr on Sunday October 29, 2023 @05:57PM
(#38063240)
Size. Ban exports of GPUs and other compute devices, task the CIA to track down leaks, bomb data centers you can't raid with the FBI. I think that's very unlikely to happen though.
Re:Yann LeCun on how lobbying for AI regulation is abused
by PeterStuer on Monday October 30, 2023 @02:47AM
(#38066393)
Why do you think that unlikely? It happened with other tech we don't like proliferation of.
Re:Yann LeCun on how lobbying for AI regulation is abused
by Vecr on Monday October 30, 2023 @03:14AM
(#38066513)
It's not a lost cause if you want to advocate for it, it might be worth setting up a protest because not a lot of others appear to be doing so, see Holly Elmore and Rob Miles dialogue on AI Safety Advocacy at [0].
[0]: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/gDijQHHaZzeGrv2Jc/holly-elmo...
The hard part is getting data to train your model, and it becomes a natural monopoly because the service that performs better will see more traffic to collect more data.
But I don't understand how you can regulate AI in a way that makes any sense. Ban specific algorithms? Limit data collection? Create some confusing wording around generic "algorithms that improve other algorithms" or something like that?
And even if you passed such a law, it's trivially easy for someone from any other part of the world to set up an API for their ML algo to run.
Regulation on AI sounds like it would be about as successful as the war on drugs.