News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Windows installer of ImageMagick will no longer be signed. Parent comment

Re:The Windows installer of ImageMagick will no longer be si... by 1letterunixname on Sunday October 29, 2023 @02:53AM (#38056350)
You appear to be leaping to the wrong conclusion. The problem is Canonical charging money for security updates. CentOS, Alma, Rocky, Fedora, Debian, openSUSE, Arch, and 300+ other Linux distros don't charge money for security updates either. The moral of the story is "Don't use enshitifying corporate Linux distros run by crazy people."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Windows installer of ImageMagick will no longer be si... by r4indeer on Sunday October 29, 2023 @03:02AM (#38056397)
This still has nothing to do with the ImageMagick developers, which the original comment implies: "Compare [sic] to codesign, vulnerability management is more concerning."

You are free to criticize Canonical for their business model, but that seems off-topic to me right now.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Windows installer of ImageMagick will no longer be si... by tremon on Sunday October 29, 2023 @09:24AM (#38058389)
The problem of Canonical charging money for security updates is off-topic when we're discussing ImageMagick's code-signing troubles on Windows.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Windows installer of ImageMagick will no longer be si... by 1letterunixname on Monday October 30, 2023 @12:14AM (#38065605)
That's your opinion, and I don't care for your attempts to shut people down. Kindly control people on the rest of the internet. :peace:
[ Parent | on HN ]