If we are going by, "random person on the internet prediction proves correct" then nothing is unexpected. I think that they are mostly correct here.

> Disinformation researchers have found relatively few A.I. fakes, and even fewer that are convincing. Yet the mere possibility that A.I. content could be circulating is leading people to dismiss genuine images, video and audio as inauthentic.

People don't expect the nihilistic second order effect where the mere existence of AI taints all evidence.