Good LLM Validation Is Just Good Validation

Re:Good LLM Validation Is Just Good Validation by danenania on Friday October 27, 2023 @03:43PM (#38043000)

Or put even simpler: calling a function with the result of another function.

I’d question how much value FP abstractions like partials and composition are really adding in your example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Good LLM Validation Is Just Good Validation by TeMPOraL on Friday October 27, 2023 @03:48PM (#38043056)

Oh, I didn't mean to invoke FP abstractions - "composition" is used outside of FP, and "partial"... that's just bad naming choice on my end. This example was meant to be dumb, imperative C-like code.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Good LLM Validation Is Just Good Validation by danenania on Friday October 27, 2023 @03:52PM (#38043109)

Ah sorry, I saw ‘partial’ and thought you were passing around functions. Please disregard my comment :)

[ Parent | on HN ]