News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Was Rust Worth It? by dingi on Thursday October 26, 2023 @02:06AM (#38022198)
what's wrong with XML? Maven XML is a configuration not a programming language.
Re:Was Rust Worth It? by xtremegoose on Thursday October 26, 2023 @05:28AM (#38023495)
Is this a joke? XML is horrible to work with, more boilerplate than information. Compare your average maven file to a cargo.toml and tell me which is easier to work with...
Re:Was Rust Worth It? by richbell on Thursday October 26, 2023 @08:54AM (#38024865)
"XML is more verbose" is a lazy criticism in the same veign as "Python is better than Java because you can do 'Hello World' in one line".

Maven files have a simple conventional structure and a defined schema. Once you learn it, it's a breeze to work with. It's not like you need to write hundreds of lines of SOAP or XLST — which is actually why people started to dislike XML, and not because XML inherently bad.

Edit: I'd also take XML over TOML any day, especially when it comes to nested objects and arrays.

Re:Was Rust Worth It? by tootie on Thursday October 26, 2023 @10:11AM (#38025833)
For a descriptor verbose is superior. It's way clearer what you're looking at. Matching a named end tag is much easier than matching a }. Also, XSD means you can strictly type and enumerate valid values and you will instantly see if you've written something invalid.