Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by goalonetwo on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @01:35PM
(#38015588)
you listened to Musk a bit too much.
And no, a neural net and two cameras are not "just fine". The day cameras will be as good as your eyes and your neural net will be on the level of human intelligence (AGI) then maybe it would be possible. But until then you will need to rely on extra hardware to get there.
Go check on youtube how FSD behaves in city with 1/10th the complexity of SF/Waymo. And remember the difficulty is with the long tail of unexpected events.
Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by solardev on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @07:30PM
(#38019704)
We don't drive just fine, we routinely kill each other, often because of poor visibility or not noticing motion. Backing into a busy street? Bam. Open your door without checking? Biker down. Passing a bus at a crosswalk? Pedestrian dead. Driving at night with heavy fog? Off the cliff.
Even your basic non-fancy non-AI car these days have a variety of sonar/radar assists to help out their cameras. Tesla is just being cheap (and getting people killed because of it).
Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by lancesells on Friday October 27, 2023 @08:09PM
(#38045564)
Speeding and drunk driving are the two big ones that kill people.
Also, we can drive just fine with two cameras and a neural net, no LIDAR.
In engineering, you don't add something unless it's necessary, not because "well we may as well have it."