News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Autolicious – AI-powered bookmark cataloging Chr... by visarga on Monday October 23, 2023 @04:35PM (#37991216)
alway wonder why browsers don't keep at least a text version of the pages for search

nowadays I expect browsers to incorporate small LLMs like Mistral out of the box

Re:Show HN: Autolicious – AI-powered bookmark cataloging Chr... by coolvision on Monday October 23, 2023 @05:43PM (#37991994)
if history search worked better then you would visit google/bing less, so I expect pushback from browser vendors

also: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=297648

Re:Show HN: Autolicious – AI-powered bookmark cataloging Chr... by TeMPOraL on Monday October 23, 2023 @07:04PM (#37992802)
From a comment on that issue page, dating a little over a decade ago:

> Shouldn't this be left to users to decide whether they want a feature or not.

Yes, those were good times. Nowadays, it's anathema to software vendors, and increasingly even to open source devs.

Re:Show HN: Autolicious – AI-powered bookmark cataloging Chr... by totetsu on Monday October 23, 2023 @08:48PM (#37993647)
Another advertising revenue win for Query Jerry from marketing.
Re:Show HN: Autolicious – AI-powered bookmark cataloging Chr... by poyu on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @12:31AM (#37994863)
Not every browser vendor runs a search engine…
Re:Show HN: Autolicious – AI-powered bookmark cataloging Chr... by janalsncm on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @02:14PM (#38003041)
Apple and Mozilla aren’t Google. Apple runs their own searches on the App Store and iPhone, but Google pays them to be default. There’s no reason Apple couldn’t also index your search history in a more meaningful way other than perhaps space requirements.
Re:Show HN: Autolicious – AI-powered bookmark cataloging Chr... by patapong on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @02:24PM (#38003170)
Opera used to do this! And then when you searched in the top bar, it would also search your visited pages. It was very useful.