News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100

    1. 0
    2. 1
    3. 3
    4. 10
    5. 2
    6. 5
    7. 100
    8. 7
    9. 99
    10. 12
    11. 9
    12. 11
    13. 20
    14. 4
    15. 6
    16. 13
    17. 8
    18. 25
    19. 75
    20. 42
    21. 50
    22. 55
    23. 15
    24. 32
    25. 80
    26. 66
    27. 30
    28. 40
    29. 60
    30. 70
    31. 39
    32. 24
    33. 90
    34. 22
    35. 97
    36. 33
    37. 44
    38. 77
    39. 88
    40. 14
    41. 21
    42. 16
    43. 17
    44. 18
    45. 48
    46. 19
    47. 74
    48. 35
    49. 45
    50. 36
    51. 23
    52. 65
    53. 26
    54. 27
    55. 84
    56. 46
    57. 28
    58. 29
    59. 30
    60. 72
    61. 31
    62. 98
    63. 63
    64. 34
    65. 86
    66. 37
    67. 56
    68. 38
    69. 41
    70. 43
    71. 64
    72. 97
    73. 82
    74. 47
    75. 68
    76. 93
    77. 49
    78. 51
    79. 52
    80. 53
    81. 54
    82. 58
    83. 59
    84. 61
    85. 92
    86. 62
    87. 67
    88. 94
    89. 71
    90. 73
    91. 76
    92. 78
    93. 96
    94. 79
    95. 81
    96. 83
    97. 85
    98. 87
    99. 89
    100. 57
( 10 comments | on HN )
Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by kylebenzle on Monday October 23, 2023 @01:37AM (#37981972)
What do you guys think, any favorite numbers, any you hate? Like 57, its just stupid :)
Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by mg on Monday October 23, 2023 @01:48AM (#37982027)
Only positive integers from 0 to 100?

If we would allow all real numbers, I would surely include pi and -1 in the top 100.

Since you already have 10 in there at position 4, I would say there is nothing so special about 100 that it deserves to be higher up than - say - pi.

So I would assign 3.14159 to position 7.

I think I would include -1 at position 8.

Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by kylebenzle on Monday October 23, 2023 @03:04PM (#37990117)
That is fair, I should have titled it "Integers 0-100"

As for 100, its such a lovely number, not as garish as 1,000 but more confident than 10.

Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by beardyw on Monday October 23, 2023 @01:55AM (#37982073)
I always feel 51 is underrated.

Also 63 being in 63rd place. I think that deserves a higher ranking ;)

Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by foothebar on Monday October 23, 2023 @02:15AM (#37982166)
Many good ones, agreed – but shouldn't be 6 on 66? Or 66 on 6? And of course 42 much more in front – it's 101010, dude!
Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by aborsy on Monday October 23, 2023 @03:14AM (#37982452)
69 should be high up!
Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by gaoryrt on Monday October 23, 2023 @04:27AM (#37982940)
For me, 7 and 77 should rank higher
Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by coolca on Monday October 23, 2023 @07:08AM (#37984037)
How could you put 57 last? It is the year of birth of my father…
Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by maksut on Monday October 23, 2023 @07:48AM (#37984344)
What 91 and 95 did to you? They are not in the list. And 97 gets to enjoy two places. It is just not fair!
Re:My ranking of the best numbers from 0-100 by gabrielsroka on Monday October 23, 2023 @03:30PM (#37990423)
You're off by 1.