Re:Bitwarden developer survey: Secrets, security and the fut...
by cassianoleal on Sunday October 22, 2023 @07:06PM
(#37979879)
1Password already has it. I'm sure others will implement it soon enough as well.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bitwarden developer survey: Secrets, security and the fut...
by OJFord on Sunday October 22, 2023 @08:05PM
(#37980192)
Sure, but the man on the Clapham omnibus is going to use Apple's, or whatever's, that's what I don't like - it seems set up to serve incumbents rather than to stand on technical merit.
There's precedent for only supporting certain walled gardens, too: Google MFA sign-in supports Yubikeys et al. only if used in Chrome; in Firefox for example you get the prompt and everything, it just stubbornly refuses to accept it on touch.
Re:Bitwarden developer survey: Secrets, security and the fut...
by cassianoleal on Monday October 23, 2023 @03:52AM
(#37982685)
> but the man on the Clapham omnibus is going to use Apple's, or whatever's, that's what I don't like
You don't like that people will use the tool that's most convenient to them? I'm not sure I understand your argument.
Right now pretty much all people except us geeks either:
- Re-use the same password everywhere; or
- Use their OS's password manager; or
- Use their browser's password manager.
How is this any worse?
Re:Bitwarden developer survey: Secrets, security and the fut...
by blitzar on Monday October 23, 2023 @05:33AM
(#37983406)
> Google MFA sign-in supports Yubikeys et al. only if used in Chrome; in Firefox for example you get the prompt and everything, it just stubbornly refuses to accept it on touch.
Ok you made me look because I was sure I had been doing this every morning; Myth busted - Logged in to Google using a Yubikey via Firefox (Windows 11) no problems at all.