News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The perils of Lisp in production by peteretep on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @09:29AM (#3797446)
I thought the main peril was that the beards of the programmers would get caught on things...
Re:The perils of Lisp in production by rbanffy on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @09:51AM (#3797539)
Careful with your necktie.
Re:The perils of Lisp in production by e40 on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @09:46AM (#3797518)
This so childish. If this article was about Python or some other language, this type of comment wouldn't be tolerated. Why is it when the topic is lisp?
Re:The perils of Lisp in production by peteretep on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @10:13AM (#3797647)
I like this Larry Wall quote:

"By policy, LISP has never really catered to mere mortals. And, of course, mere mortals have never really forgiven LISP for not catering to them."

I say this as someone who's prototyped several things in Scheme before porting this to other languages.

Re:The perils of Lisp in production by jff on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @03:43PM (#3799454)
Because it's a funny little stereotype that has a grain of truth to it (come on, you've never heard of "old Lisp greybeards"?) and at least in my mind isn't insulting. At least, if someone implied I was a bearded old programmer, I'd be happy to be included with the likes of McCarthy, Ritchie, Kernighan, and Thompson.

Now, if we were talking about Python and someone said, "the main peril of Python programmers is that they'll get apple juice and crayon all over everything", that would be insulting!