Really the source material, regardless of its flaws struck me fundamentally as a well deserved reaction to the vast bullshit grievance mongering fields of sinecures for pseudo-intellectuals. Those who do absolutely nothing to improve upon anything at all yet climb up upon the cross and act like they are the savior of us all. All those who shout for generic caution and claim profundity. Those who shame actual useful and productive work as fundamentally unethical, as if doing absolutely nothing in the face of problems would be preferable.

In truth they are all the same thing. The utterly useless casting themselves as essential like the typical liberal arts professor, but with less use for general writing writing. A billion "critiques of capitalism" have done less for the poor than one outsourcing to a third world nation. What has the "precautionary principle" wrought for anybody?