News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:"<ESC>[31M"? ANSI Terminal security in 2023 and finding 1... by astrobe_ on Saturday October 21, 2023 @03:09AM (#37964753)
But then, don't you have the problem of synchronizing the data channel and the control channel?
Re:"<ESC>[31M"? ANSI Terminal security in 2023 and finding 1... by im3w1l on Saturday October 21, 2023 @02:09PM (#37969177)
Well as an example you could have a sequence of messages, and every message starts with some metadata like what type it is (data / control) and how long it is.
Re:"<ESC>[31M"? ANSI Terminal security in 2023 and finding 1... by butlerm on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @09:27AM (#37998899)
It is possible to sequence messages across multiple channels although of course you have to design the transport protocol to support that. Alternatively you can just have typed, ordered messages within the same channel, which is a much more likely design for something like this.