News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows 11 Pro's On-by-Default Encryption Slows SSDs Up t... by supertrope on Friday October 20, 2023 @05:41PM (#37961877)
It depends on your threat model. Just enabling BitLocker will defeat someone from plugging in a Linux live USB and resetting your Windows password. For corporate security ATA Secure Erase done by a vendor who accepts liability and gives them a "certificate of data destruction" may be enough to meet HIPAA, FERPA, SOX compliance requirements. Or they consider drives cheap enough that physically shredding them to ensure no mistakes is the better choice. At the national security level you pulverize the drives after zeroing them.
Re:Windows 11 Pro's On-by-Default Encryption Slows SSDs Up t... by neodymiumphish on Friday October 20, 2023 @07:11PM (#37962516)
As one who's actually had the pleasure of getting to use one of the classified drive destroyers, there aren't armed guards. Not sure if there's a requirement that it be done in a room with no windows, though.

My point was that Kenny's claim is that on-drive encryption allows for easier "erasure", presumably by deleting the keys needed to decrypt the data and leaving the drive in the same state.

If that process is good enough to ensure proper "erasure" of the data (effectively complete prevention of data access), then how is it not equally secure as an encryption schema?