[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/drillinginfo/2016/02/22/debunki...
[0] https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/09/23/Sti...
The interesting finding presented in the paper are:
[p. 9] "Underpricing of fossil fuels is still pervasive across countries and is often substantial, especially for coal."
[p. 9] 18% of these subsidies go to gasoline
[p. 9] "The power generation sector is the largest recipient of subsidies"
[p. 10] "By region East Asia and the Pacific accounts for 48 percent of total energy subsidies"
[p. 7] China and India together had 3.4 Million premature deaths due to air pollution in 2020 (The USA had 0.1 Million)
From an economic efficiency point of view, I can understand that prices are important, but wouldn't we have to take account of the benefits of using petroleum fuels too? Like allowing developing countries to feed their populations? They clearly can't do this with solar powered agriculture and solar powered shipping.
They make cars as fast as they can sell them and have a backlog of orders. "Paying the price" is one thing they are not doing.
No, Toyota invested heavily in hybrid technology in order to keep their ICE core business alive and then tried to go all in on Hydrogen with heavy lobby to top it off.
They are not lagging behind, they made multiple bad calls, betting on the wrong horses and are now paying the price.