News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on FCC moves ahead with Title II net neutrality rules in 3-2 party-line vote. Parent comment

Re:FCC moves ahead with Title II net neutrality rules in 3-2... by thebradbain on Thursday October 19, 2023 @01:48PM (#37946083)
Yet it can’t be used to stop California vehicle emission standards, which is why almost all car manufacturers in the US make cars up to California’s higher standards, because they’re so big.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FCC moves ahead with Title II net neutrality rules in 3-2... by bigstrat2003 on Thursday October 19, 2023 @02:13PM (#37946436)
In fairness, while I detest that California's laws become de facto national laws, it doesn't seem appropriate to use the commerce clause there. California isn't trying to regulate interstate commerce, it's not their fault that manufacturers are too cheap to have different models that meet California's standards while having a normal model for the rest of the country.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FCC moves ahead with Title II net neutrality rules in 3-2... by pyuser583 on Friday October 20, 2023 @05:11PM (#37961593)
We use the commerce clause everywhere.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FCC moves ahead with Title II net neutrality rules in 3-2... by bigstrat2003 on Saturday October 21, 2023 @11:17PM (#37972521)
I know. And we shouldn't.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FCC moves ahead with Title II net neutrality rules in 3-2... by l33t7332273 on Thursday October 19, 2023 @01:50PM (#37946112)
Right but the internet is inherently an interstate enterprise. That’s why I feel it likely falls under the purview of congress.
[ Parent | on HN ]