News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bill Gates demonstrates Visual Basic (1991) [video] by zerr on Wednesday October 18, 2023 @06:08PM (#37935430)
Why Microsoft was never able to come up with Borland C++Builder competitor? i.e. RAD for C++.

Even today there is no WinUI3 GUI designer for C++.

Re:Bill Gates demonstrates Visual Basic (1991) [video] by ahati on Wednesday October 18, 2023 @08:34PM (#37936728)
VC++ was pretty good. I have good memories with VC++ 6. At that time borland was mostly following MS - or as I thought. I liked MS approach much better than anything else in the market.

Desktop computing era is over now :(

Re:Bill Gates demonstrates Visual Basic (1991) [video] by badsectoracula on Thursday October 19, 2023 @02:33AM (#37939290)
The VC6 IDE was nice as a code editor and debugger and the compiler was a bit better than C++ Builder's, but that is only as far as it goes. When it came to making desktop GUI applications C++ Builder was lightyears ahead of VC6. In fact it still is, it is much easier to make a desktop GUI application[0] in the very first version of C++ Builder than it is on the very latest version of Visual C++.

The VCL framework combined with the visual editor in C++ Builder[1] are way more advanced than anything Microsoft has made available for (regular[2]) C++ developers targeting the windows desktop.

[0] as long as you don't care about the fact it'll use some old versions of GUI controls, though a manifest resource can fix that

[1] and Delphi, where it really came from

[2] i do not count using Managed C++ or whatever .NET based, those are different beasts