News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Winsorized Mean by amitport on Wednesday October 18, 2023 @04:17PM (#37934202)
it makes sense and it is better estimator of the expected value than the sample mean in some cases:

https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-statistics/volu...

Re:Winsorized Mean by smcin on Wednesday October 18, 2023 @04:33PM (#37934401)
Is "some cases" closer to 1% or 50+%? That paper is behind a paywall.

How does it do on normal and other common distributions?

Re:Winsorized Mean by _0ffh on Wednesday October 18, 2023 @07:02PM (#37935979)
It seems obvious that for symmetrical distributions, like the normal, winsorizing does not change the mean.
Re:Winsorized Mean by smcin on Wednesday October 18, 2023 @09:36PM (#37937179)
Was looking for an answer for other common distributions, or a one-line summary of the paper.
Re:Winsorized Mean by amitport on Thursday October 19, 2023 @02:45AM (#37939366)
but it can converge faster to the mean with the sample size...
Re:Winsorized Mean by amitport on Thursday October 19, 2023 @02:45AM (#37939368)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11391 it's pretty much the same thing
Re:Winsorized Mean by stdbrouw on Thursday October 19, 2023 @03:19AM (#37939548)
The tradeoff is that while there are many estimators of the expected value that are more efficient (have less variance) than the sample mean for various distributions, they typically introduce bias.