News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Techno-Optimist Manifesto by nickpp on Monday October 16, 2023 @06:20PM (#37907470)
Countless ways. From sheer governmental incompetence like when regulating the competition out of markets. To simply not understanding second order effects when “helping markets” with patents and humongous copyright terms. To not understanding supply and demand when pressed to fulfill voter promises like when attempting to control and fix prices. To being captive to interest groups that end up controlling a huge chunk of economy like in heath care.

But most of all through sheer, pure corruption. Because why else would someone become a politician - a relatively low paid position - if not to be in a position to transform all that power and influence into money, for the highest bidder?

Re:The Techno-Optimist Manifesto by james4k on Monday October 16, 2023 @06:33PM (#37907567)
And who are the highest bidders?
Re:The Techno-Optimist Manifesto by scubbo on Monday October 16, 2023 @09:34PM (#37909245)
Corporations, in America, where the travesty known as Citizens United exists.

(I'm not claiming that other countries don't have money in politics; but America is the one where it is most clearly enshrined with an actual name to the philosophy)

Re:The Techno-Optimist Manifesto by nickpp on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @05:10AM (#37912356)
Incumbents, of course. The ones holding the largest interest in preserving the status-quo and freezing competition. Professional organizations needing power to preserve the barrier of entry. Huge, trans-national Unions.

But other power brokers as well. Other politicians with more money. Their own stock holdings. Foreign powers. Well moneyed interest groups. Ideological organizations siphoning old money.

Occasionally even the scrappy start-up trying to game the system. These usually fail, see SBF - but they are not saints either.

There is no shortage in interests vying to corrupt politicians. Somehow they never mind and always succumb.