Re:Orthographic Depth
by feoren on Monday October 16, 2023 @06:14PM
(#37907413)
Just because something looks weird to us does not mean it's bad. I can read the last sentence at about 70% speed, and I suspect you can too; that means within the 20-year time frame (facetiously) proposed, we could both easily adapt to this. And that's with bad choices intentionally cherry-picked by Twain to ridicule the idea. If the reductio ad absurditem is not really all that absurdum, that's a point in favor of the idea.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Orthographic Depth
by kelseyfrog on Monday October 16, 2023 @06:50PM
(#37907738)
It should be possible to do orthographic replacement using an LLM-based browser plugin and a trivial prompt to subjectively test the hypothesis.