Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by tiffanyh on Monday October 16, 2023 @03:36PM
(#37905166)
When FANNG companies payout upwards of $1M/year/engineer - seems hard to understand why an employee would need a union.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by callalex on Monday October 16, 2023 @03:45PM
(#37905335)
Those companies are absolutely not paying out 1M/yr to the average engineer. Only a small handful of engineers make that much money.
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by aeyes on Monday October 16, 2023 @03:46PM
(#37905360)
Let's start with on-call, some companies ask to always be on-call to whatever extend the local law permits. No weekend for you.
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by meowtimemania on Monday October 16, 2023 @03:53PM
(#37905472)
That doesn’t happen at LinkedIn. I don’t totally understand what I would have to gain from a union when I feel like my employer treats me really well. The union feels like unneeded overhead
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by asadotzler on Monday October 16, 2023 @06:58PM
(#37907837)
When the NBA pays its players tens of millions of dollars a year - seems hard to understand why an NBA player would need a union.
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by tiffanyh on Monday October 16, 2023 @08:53PM
(#37908850)
The NBA is an extreme outlier case where even the NBA wants there to be a union because any single player can have drastic negative repercussions.
Theres virtually no other business that yields so much revenue from only ~10 people (5 on court players and 5 bench players).
If Lebron decided to not show up to a bunch of games, this would have massive repercussions for the entire league & TV contracts.