Re:A little-known pollution rule keeps the air dirty for mil...
by jjk166 on Monday October 16, 2023 @01:01PM
(#37902828)
You seem to be confused, the data isn't being deleted so that no one else can consume it. It is just being annotated to be excluded from the EPA's evaluation of whether stricter pollution controls than already implemented are necessary.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A little-known pollution rule keeps the air dirty for mil...
by lucideer on Monday October 16, 2023 @01:08PM
(#37902932)
> whether stricter pollution controls than already implemented are necessary
in which case this seems to posit that measures to reduce human causes of wildfires are not valid pollution control measures?
Re:A little-known pollution rule keeps the air dirty for mil...
by jjk166 on Monday October 16, 2023 @03:43PM
(#37905305)
No, it's positing that valid pollution control measures don't reduce human caused wildfires. These specific valid pollution control measures are just restrictions on industrial emissions, not "all conceivable pollution controls".