News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Justices Approve Strip-Searches for Any Offense by anigbrowl on Monday April 02, 2012 @03:29PM (#3789664)
If you try following my train of thought, which is only a few paragraphs long, you'll see that I'm saying the law is deeply flawed.
Re:Justices Approve Strip-Searches for Any Offense by mikecane on Monday April 02, 2012 @03:46PM (#3789735)
Yes, I see that. But that middle part irked me too much.
Re:Justices Approve Strip-Searches for Any Offense by anigbrowl on Monday April 02, 2012 @04:01PM (#3789792)
Well, there's a difference between a positive (descriptive) statement of how things are, and a normative statement of how they should be. It's hard to have a constructive discussion of the latter when every statement of the former results in a derailment of the conversation.
Re:Justices Approve Strip-Searches for Any Offense by mikecane on Monday April 02, 2012 @05:04PM (#3790088)
Well, you're taking it personally rather than my being cranky about the wording that clearly described their point of view.
Re:Justices Approve Strip-Searches for Any Offense by anigbrowl on Monday April 02, 2012 @05:11PM (#3790126)
When you wrote Look, you can spout whatever "The law says..." all you want [...] then I assumed that your remarks were addressed to me, not to someone else. This exchange is becoming increasingly pointless.
Re:Justices Approve Strip-Searches for Any Offense by tptacek on Monday April 02, 2012 @10:28PM (#3791183)
This right here is another really annoying message board tic. Outrage trumps understanding, so much so that it's legitimate to rant at someone for not being outraged enough.