Re:Reproducibility trial: 246 biologists get different resul...
by icegreentea2 on Friday October 13, 2023 @02:06PM
(#37873595)
Starting with a hypothesis doesn't require a detailed mechanism. Both questions posed in the article have a proposed mechanism - they clearly have a cause and proposed effect listed. This isn't the same thing as mining a giant generic database looking for arbitrary correlation.
The replication issue highlighted here is how choices in analytical approach can yield differing answers. This would be true even if you had a detailed proposed mechanism.
Re:Reproducibility trial: 246 biologists get different resul...
by jewayne on Monday October 16, 2023 @06:08PM
(#37907349)
But neither one specified a falsifiable hypothesis. Which, to this layman's mind, means that any general statement made based upon the data is itself a hypothesis.
The replication issue highlighted here is how choices in analytical approach can yield differing answers. This would be true even if you had a detailed proposed mechanism.