OpenAI has quietly changed its 'core values,' putting greater emphasis on AGI

Re:OpenAI has quietly changed its 'core values,' putting gre... by graypegg on Friday October 13, 2023 @12:50PM (#37872681)

+1 for “what that even means”.

I keep seeing people say “AGI” but no one will define it for me. It’s always “you know it when you see it” or “when software can do anything”.

I’m alright with “things will continue to advance” but people assume it’s a single event that happens, not a goal post that represents “the dream” that moves 1 step further away every 1 step we advance.

Just shouting random platitudes and religious grandiosity at people is just annoying.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:OpenAI has quietly changed its 'core values,' putting gre... by kylebenzle on Friday October 13, 2023 @03:29PM (#37874546)

This is a good write-up below, but why not just say AGI is something that is indistinguishable from a human? That definition seems to work.

https://towardsdatascience.com/beyond-the-turing-test-two-sc...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:OpenAI has quietly changed its 'core values,' putting gre... by Filligree on Wednesday October 18, 2023 @10:55AM (#37929597)

Because we'll never have something indistinguishable from human. Once AI is as good as a human at everything, it'll also be far better than human at something. Possibly most things.

[ Parent | on HN ]