News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Higher Mushroom Consumption Associated with Lower Cancer ... by rsynnott on Friday October 13, 2023 @09:59AM (#37870699)
> "... If someone like Stamets came out and said that point blank he could be sued for making radical claims..."

By... who? The mushrooms, for libel?

(Also, what on earth is going on with r/mycology? Impressive amount of conspiracy theory nonsense voted up there.)

Re:Higher Mushroom Consumption Associated with Lower Cancer ... by anjel on Friday October 13, 2023 @10:26AM (#37871007)
As the reddit comments state, "big portabello." Mushroom farming is a big business, even for Stametz, and widespread, predictably alarmist media coverage about the yes but no nature of carcinogens in criminis wouldn't be good for business. So he did a less than optimal job of steering clear of the issue on Rogancast. And everyone picked up on it, except for news media, so far...
Re:Higher Mushroom Consumption Associated with Lower Cancer ... by rsynnott on Friday October 13, 2023 @07:34PM (#37876752)
I mean, scientists, public commentators, regulators have been calling out agribusiness over tobacco, sugar, meat, alcohol for over a century at this point. It slightly stretches credibility to imagine that someone complaining about mushrooms on a podcast would be the breaking point.