Re:60 minutes: Is sugar toxic?
by oconnore on Sunday April 01, 2012 @11:59PM
(#3786232)
I think you overestimated how obvious that was. While rebutting a particular appeal to authority, you made your own.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
This right here is one of the more annoying message board tics.
Re:60 minutes: Is sugar toxic?
by georgieporgie on Monday April 02, 2012 @12:19AM
(#3786298)
I'm pretty sure that's not what people mean when they talk about appeal to authority. An actual appeal to authority is fine. A fallacious appeal to authority is one where the 'authority' in question has little or questionable authority in the area being discussed.
Here is a possibly legitimate appeal to authority, although you could refute it on its own grounds :-)
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
Re:60 minutes: Is sugar toxic?
by jodrellblank on Tuesday April 03, 2012 @06:56AM
(#3792362)
An actual appeal to authority isn't "fine", it's saying
"Accept my logic as correct because I namedrop a well regarded name as a supporter". But since well regarded people can be wrong this is no sort of proof at all.
Re:60 minutes: Is sugar toxic?
by georgieporgie on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @01:36PM
(#3798729)
I think you need to read the Wikipedia entry on Argument from Authority.