EDIT: Oh, I think I see the source of confusion:
> A matrix tuned for blue noise, such as those generated by the void-and-cluster method, produces a look closer to that of an error diffusion dither method.
If you use a dithering matrix it is by definition ordered, yes. Because it is tiling that matrix in a regular pattern. The matrix has been randomized via a blue-noise method. The test image seems to use a 16 by 16 matrix, which is very small - the seams are clearly recognizable.
However, "blue noise dithering" typically refers to generating a blue noise texture as large as the image to be dithered. This article does so, for example:
https://surma.dev/things/ditherpunk/
But yeah, I can understand the confusion now. The wording of the wiki article could be clearer.
PS: in case your curiosity has been piqued, here are some more articles on blue noise and dithering:
https://blog.demofox.org/2018/01/30/what-the-heck-is-blue-no...
https://blog.demofox.org/2019/06/25/generating-blue-noise-te...
It would have been interesting if the author did additionally apply a low pass (Gaussian blur) filter to all the result images, not just to one homogeneous one in the beginning.