No constituional protection is absolute, as they usually contradict each other to at least some extend. The difference where different societies place the focus - the US is strongly in favor of freedom of speech, whereas European states usually are less absolutist about speech.

One significant difference is the US constitutional assertion that "certain inalienable rights" (notably the freedom to speak) are "endowed by our creator". In practice, this places such rights outside the authority of governments.

In most other countries, rights are constructed and granted at the pleasure of the government currently in power.

It's easy to overlook this philosophical difference as pedantic, but the ramifications are profound.

Godel's constitutional theorem

How many are brave enough to challenge it in the face of arrest or worse police violence?

Judging by this (linked up in the thread) - plenty: https://x.com/NationalIndNews/status/1712525993854833142?s=2...

Freedom of speech is a myth. It never existed in any western country. Dissent is only tolerated as long as its powerless. After that its physically crushed, infiltrated by govt agents, its bank accounts frozen or otherwise neutralized.

Liberalism is a lie.

Do you have any idea how many jews directly or indirectly wield significant power and influence in Western politics and law? Do you think a constitution is going to stop them exerting that in the interests of Jews and Israel?