News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by ale42 on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @05:06PM (#37850259)
Any idea how it compares to Signal? They should be essentially using the same protocol. I also used it with good results with slow connectivity, but never tried on bad 2G...
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by sangnoir on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @05:39PM (#37850581)
Unfortunately I don't have any data points on how Signal operates 2G speeds
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by briffle on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @05:29PM (#37850491)
I have tried to use signal in a location that had voice, but no data (a very old, very rural tower in the middle of nowhere) a few years ago, and signal was completely worthless. Even though it can read and receive SMS, it seems to require a data connection to send..
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by vdqtp3 on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @05:55PM (#37850755)
Yes, everything except voice and SMS requires data
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by kelnos on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @06:09PM (#37850937)
Yes, that would be the case for any OTT messenger (so, anything but SMS).
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by callalex on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @05:48PM (#37850684)
The encryption protocol is fairly unrelated to how an app handles poor connectivity. It’s a bit like comparing different websites handling poor connectivity differently even though they are all served over HTTP.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by lxgr on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @08:44PM (#37852194)
I believe their communication layers are fairly different – WhatsApp used to use something based on XMPP at least until a while ago; I'm not sure what Signal uses, but I vaguely remember it being based on HTTP?
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by ale42 on Thursday October 12, 2023 @06:37AM (#37855466)
Can definitely be, I never investigated in detail, although I used alternative open source clients for both (signal-cli and a long time ago yowsup), so the information should be in there...

I hoped that Signal's use of HTTP was as a fallback in case a direct connection could not be established to use a more "compact" protocol, but I possibly don't remember correctly what I've read...