News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by tpmx on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @04:42PM (#37850000)
> and Starlink’s direct to cell won’t either

I could see it kinda working, at low frequencies. They are not that far away and there's not many things blocking the signal besides your roof.

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by Scoundreller on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @04:54PM (#37850128)
Me too, but at slower data rates. At 550km above, that’s still a big signal loss by inverse square law. Problem with slow data rates is that they clog up the channels.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by tpmx on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @05:11PM (#37850307)
The inverse square law effect can be remedied using similar tech as in the Starlink consumer antennas. You aim the signal to where it's consumed.

> Problem with slow data rates is that they clog up the channels.

Yes, we must protect the tubes! :)

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by Scoundreller on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @11:51PM (#37853318)
Phased arrays work without having to repoint, but they don't overcome lack of incidence (insolation?)

(e.g. we can't build a solar panel that works perpendicular to the sun (or nearly perpendicular) using phased array technology because there just isn't much solar radiation hitting the "dish" in the first place)