News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by Scoundreller on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @04:04PM (#37849580)
WhatsApp also gracefully handles being offline and queuing messages for later.

That can’t be said of iMessage.

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by sangnoir on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @05:02PM (#37850221)
Offline queueing is a fantastic feature! I know someone who lives in a remote area whose phone only gets network connectivity when they walk up a specific hill. In many ways, they use WhatsApp the way most people used email in the dialup days: read and compose offline, then go online once a day to send and receive new messages.

Edit: I sometimes get a chuckle when they say "Look at this cool picture I took", and then receive the picture some days later when the conversation thread has moved on. I guess they'd have stayed in thr coverage area for long enough for the entire image to upload.

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by lxgr on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @08:40PM (#37852174)
This is so bizarre to me. How can a native application not implement that, while a third-party application nails it!?
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by bdavbdav on Thursday October 12, 2023 @08:03AM (#37856038)
I know when people are in low signal as I get a green then exactly the same blue some time later.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by Scoundreller on Thursday October 12, 2023 @11:29AM (#37858590)
Which creates issues when you have signal but don’t have a sub to send that actual message over sms.

Sometimes sms failover creates further problems because when travelling you’re more likely to have intermittent wifi than intermittent sms access.

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by bdavbdav on Thursday October 12, 2023 @01:58PM (#37860599)
I think luckily you can turn off auto sms fallback - but it does indeed default to on.