News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by jessriedel on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @03:37PM (#37849257)
Obviously we shouldn't pretend sat phones from Garmin and others haven't existed for decades, but Starlink direct to cell is very different. First, as others have mentioned, traditional sat phones requires dedicated hardware with a chonky antenna; this works with normal cellphones, which means order of magnitude higher adoption. Maybe more fundamentally, the satellites that existing sat phones use are in much higher orbits so there is irreducible latency (due to speed of light) and bandwidth costs that LEO Starlink sats will likely crush in the next few years.
Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by newZWhoDis on Thursday October 12, 2023 @01:13AM (#37853663)
Order of magnitude? Try 5 orders of magnitude.

I’d be willing to be the ratio of cellphones to sat phones is > 10,000 to 1

Re:Starlink Direct to Cell by jessriedel on Saturday October 14, 2023 @03:47PM (#37883674)
Tbc, this was a typo by me. I definitely meant “orders” (hence no “an”). Thx.