Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so...
by dataflow on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @09:16AM
(#37831652)
In confused, where in my comment does the Markdown syntax come into play? You're not seeing italics or backslashes are you?
Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so...
by psd1 on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @05:03PM
(#37837437)
I see now - Hacki renders italics, but the browser doesn't.
Excuse my confusion, this possibility didn't occur to me.
Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so...
by fanf2 on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @09:26AM
(#37831796)
Hacker News does not use Markdown.
Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so...
by masklinn on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @09:58AM
(#37832178)
While that’s technically true, it does use a severely cut down version thereof which is worse in every way: it only supports paragraphs, code blocks, and emphasis so the ability to format is extremely limited but the emphasis can still screw you over, which requires an explicit preview (or posting) to notice.
And I think escaping emphasis was only introduced somewhat recently? I do remember that for the longest time you basically had to trick HN into not breaking your comments by using a different character in stead.
Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so...
by OJFord on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @09:59AM
(#37832197)
No, but it does use:
*
for italics, which sometimes causes a comment to go haywire because someone uses it to reference a footnote or otherwise drops it in mid-sentence, with a matching closing one, not intending italics.(Up-thread I think it probably was like that when they commented, but has since been fixed.)
Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so...
by wruza on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @04:20PM
(#37836944)
Btw, you can now(?) escape * in a paragraph with \*.
Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so...
by OJFord on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @06:54PM
(#37838816)
Yes, it's also automatic in some cases - originally my comment had an attempt at a joke example of it, but it was caught and didn't work. It was definitely improved relatively recently.
Which is ironic when discussing overloading!