News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so... by jandrese on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @08:52AM (#37831416)
> that would have been "x*.y", and "->", would not have been needed.

Arguably that syntax would have been prone to a lot of unintended pointer multiplication due to syntax error.

Re:C uses "&" for the address-operator because 'ampersand so... by loup-vaillant on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @09:48AM (#37832062)
Or we could use a different operator for pointer indirection and multiplication? There’s also the pointer/array conflation that could cause some confusion.