News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California governor vetoes bill that would have set a $35... by langsoul-com on Sunday October 08, 2023 @09:53PM (#37816133)
Even then, if they were planning on selling it under the $35 limit. Why would they bother vetoing?
Re:California governor vetoes bill that would have set a $35... by csa on Sunday October 08, 2023 @10:01PM (#37816189)
$35 would have been the cap on copay.

Costs over that are passed on to the consumer via higher premiums.

The CalRx is $30 total.

I think insulin specifically and medicines/drugs in general might be another area that CA leads the country in modeling how to manage prices and overall cost.

Re:California governor vetoes bill that would have set a $35... by kevinventullo on Monday October 09, 2023 @02:16AM (#37817428)
So, it’s still under the $35 limit. Seems like that doesn’t answer the grandparent’s question.
Re:California governor vetoes bill that would have set a $35... by kevin_thibedeau on Sunday October 08, 2023 @10:26PM (#37816329)
It's a bill created by big pharma to whitewash their image while changing nothing about their profiteering. We should not have these sort of laws on the books.
Re:California governor vetoes bill that would have set a $35... by stouset on Sunday October 08, 2023 @09:55PM (#37816150)
Why put another law on the books when you believe it will be obviated by other measures?

One reason I can think of is that a law might be more politically "durable" than a contract with a third party to produce insulin. But on the whole I think I'd rather one less law.

Re:California governor vetoes bill that would have set a $35... by minhazm on Sunday October 08, 2023 @10:03PM (#37816201)
The $35 is a cap on co-pay, not the actual cost paid out by insurance.