News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is Debian the way it is? by klysm on Sunday October 08, 2023 @02:51PM (#37813300)
I’m pretty convinced it was net positive in the long term. If Debian hadn’t gone with systemd, then where would it be today? Stuck in shell script hell?
Re:Why is Debian the way it is? by gorgoiler on Sunday October 08, 2023 @03:44PM (#37813772)
We would have been forced to bite the bullet and implement a packaging extension that allowed debs to describe what to start at boot time, when, and how. The compatability layer would have allowed any init system to be used.

Instead we welded the systemd engine into the chassis and pray that when it comes to replacing it we aren’t the ones on the hook.

Re:Why is Debian the way it is? by klysm on Sunday October 08, 2023 @04:24PM (#37814097)
> The compatability layer would have allowed any init system to be used.

I don’t see how such a compatibility layer would work in a way that doesn’t suck horribly.