News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Numbers in Various Languages by masklinn on Sunday October 08, 2023 @12:58PM (#37812235)
> 240 is a highly divisible number

Which nobody considered for a single seconds. Nobody was counting the number of pences in a pound at the time, these were not sensible scalings of values. Instead you had what was essentially 2 different scales: the pence scale (which topped out to the shillings) and the pounds scale (which bottomed out at the shilling)

> You said it yourself, 60 pence to a crown

I also said that it had no actual relevance.

> Decimalization was probably the right call in an age of calculators and computers, same with the metric system, but the old LSD system and imperial units existed for a reason, which is easy divisibility into convenient fractions.

They mostly existed because they were direct offshoots of the carolingian currency system. After all Roman currency had been decimal (or a mix of decimal and binary) before it devolved, and Russia began the movement of re-decimalising currencies.

Re:Numbers in Various Languages by samatman on Sunday October 08, 2023 @05:13PM (#37814465)
> Which nobody considered for a single second

Of course they did.

Re:Numbers in Various Languages by masklinn on Tuesday October 10, 2023 @03:45PM (#37836557)
No, they did not, again nobody would use pennies and pounds together as a single scale, such scaling is metricated thinking.
Re:Numbers in Various Languages by samatman on Friday October 13, 2023 @01:01PM (#37872812)
You can count the value of the old coinage by weighing it, you really think that such a system was an accident?

I mean, I'm familiar with the history so I know 12 of 20 was a deliberate choice, but if you don't want to read into it, ask yourself if that's plausible.