News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by drunkendog on Saturday October 07, 2023 @03:33PM (#37804785)
Not sure about the Recife protocol, but it's pretty much accepted now that the Milwaukee protocol doesn't work[1][2] - the initial case may have been some other encephalitis mimicking rabies.

[1] https://journals.lww.com/pidj/fulltext/2015/06000/the__milwa...

[2] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-...

Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by logicchains on Saturday October 07, 2023 @03:35PM (#37804817)
Your second link is an error 404, page not found.
Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by IvyMike on Saturday October 07, 2023 @03:46PM (#37804927)
Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by littlestymaar on Sunday October 08, 2023 @03:46AM (#37808619)
How did you get that “the initial case may have been some other encephalitis mimicking rabies.” from that paper?

AFAICT The paper questions the hypothesis that the 2 additional survivors had rabies, but not the first patient.

Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by IvyMike on Monday October 09, 2023 @12:48AM (#37817013)
You may want to reply to drunkendog so they see your question.
Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by littlestymaar on Monday October 09, 2023 @08:55AM (#37819977)
Oh I didn't pay attention that you weren't the original poster of that link, thanks for pointing that out!
Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by Enginerrrd on Saturday October 07, 2023 @09:03PM (#37806933)
Back when I was a paramedic, I HAD a rabies patient that survived using the Milwaukee protocol.

It doesn't work very well... but it does seem like it occasionally works.

Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by LegitShady on Saturday October 07, 2023 @10:33PM (#37807393)
That's amazing.
Re:Is the first cure for advanced rabies near? by littlestymaar on Monday October 09, 2023 @09:00AM (#37820027)
How did you get that “the initial case may have been some other encephalitis mimicking rabies.” from the decond paper paper?

AFAICT The paper questions the hypothesis that the 2 additional survivors had rabies, but not the first patient.