News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on John Carmack and Rich Sutton partner to accelerate development of AGI. Parent comment

Re:John Carmack and Rich Sutton partner to accelerate develo... by rvz on Saturday October 07, 2023 @09:34AM (#37801584)
No. The parent comment said "AI Research".

If you want "AGI" so badly, you certainly need to have an "AI research" background and a track record. Can't achieve your "AGI" without that.

Given that Carmack has a close to zero track record in this research, it makes total sense for him to partner with someone that does.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:John Carmack and Rich Sutton partner to accelerate develo... by beefield on Saturday October 07, 2023 @10:54AM (#37802207)
> Can't achieve your "AGI" without that.

Can I ask, what makes you so confident on that? For all I know (which is admittably not much), current AI may be going to a direction completely orthogonal to achieving AGI.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:John Carmack and Rich Sutton partner to accelerate develo... by howrar on Saturday October 07, 2023 @11:41AM (#37802639)
The current trend in AI isn't all of AI, and any kind of work with the goal of producing AGI would definitionally be classified as AI.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:John Carmack and Rich Sutton partner to accelerate develo... by cactusplant7374 on Saturday October 07, 2023 @09:30PM (#37807063)
We don't know how to achieve AGI. So screwing around with LLM might not be anything close to the process to achieve AGI.

https://aeon.co/essays/how-close-are-we-to-creating-artifici...

[ Parent | on HN ]