Re:Pythagorean Theorem Found on Clay Tablet 1k Years Older T...
by jaredsohn on Thursday October 05, 2023 @03:01AM
(#37775631)
or at least more complex than described
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pythagorean Theorem Found on Clay Tablet 1k Years Older T...
by r13a on Thursday October 05, 2023 @03:13AM
(#37775690)
Unless the story has some transcendental meaning ...
Re:Pythagorean Theorem Found on Clay Tablet 1k Years Older T...
by Cyphase on Thursday October 05, 2023 @03:33AM
(#37775796)
Only if you're primed to see that.
Re:Pythagorean Theorem Found on Clay Tablet 1k Years Older T...
by nopurpose on Thursday October 05, 2023 @04:28AM
(#37776144)
Don't you think this discussion is tangental to the topic?
Re:Pythagorean Theorem Found on Clay Tablet 1k Years Older T...
by brutusborn on Thursday October 05, 2023 @05:03AM
(#37776380)
Discussing the history of Pythagoras under an article on the history of his most famous theorem?
I think you have a very high bar for relevance.
Re:Pythagorean Theorem Found on Clay Tablet 1k Years Older T...
by throwaway167 on Thursday October 05, 2023 @05:06AM
(#37776394)
Do you assume a point exists?
Re:Pythagorean Theorem Found on Clay Tablet 1k Years Older T...
by nopurpose on Friday October 06, 2023 @07:08AM
(#37789202)
You are free to make approximation like that. Really, whatever floats your boat.
Re:Pythagorean Theorem Found on Clay Tablet 1k Years Older T...
by Cyphase on Thursday October 05, 2023 @05:25AM
(#37776511)
I think that's hyperbolic. It seems like a natural digression. I think you're just being negative.
Put another way, this discussion certainly has more than an infinitesimal relation to the original link.