News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple declares its $17,000 solid-gold watch officially ob... by hutzlibu on Wednesday October 04, 2023 @08:17AM (#37764048)
What is the environmental problem with a gold watch?

Aside from a little extra effort in manufacturing, I fail to see it.

Jetting everywhere for the sake of it, yes, this is worth critizicing( and mocking), but a golden luxory is harmless I think and not worth a class warfare.

Re:Apple declares its $17,000 solid-gold watch officially ob... by jraph on Wednesday October 04, 2023 @08:22AM (#37764086)
Note that I mostly have issues with hardware released in 2015 being out of support (in this discussion). The effects of gold watches on the environment has to be anecdotal.

Somebody focusing so much on status so as to need to spend this much money is merely out of my understanding. Yes, it's some form of intolerance on my side and I fully admit it.

Now, gold is both rare and needed, and implies mining, and possibly underpaid people with awful work conditions. I find building such short-lived and futile items with it irresponsible. It's fortunate it's mostly anecdotal. But these people are so out of touch with the realities of our world. This is what, among other things, I see in a gold watch.

Showing status is a double edged sword.

Of course, it works both ways. Someone wearing a gold watch probably wouldn't care for me. At least the relation is likely symmetrical.

Re:Apple declares its $17,000 solid-gold watch officially ob... by hutzlibu on Thursday October 05, 2023 @04:11AM (#37776043)
"Somebody focusing so much on status so as to need to spend this much money is merely out of my understanding."

Out of mine either. But I accept that other people have other values and rather focus on the things in common. In this case, fighting for things to last.

Re:Apple declares its $17,000 solid-gold watch officially ob... by aziaziazi on Thursday October 05, 2023 @01:08AM (#37775098)
Perhaps because the mining industry for gold is one of the dirtier ?