MatX: Efficient C++17 GPU numerical computing library with Python-like syntax

Re:MatX: Efficient C++17 GPU numerical computing library wit... by albertzeyer on Wednesday October 04, 2023 @03:13AM (#37761862)

I think a comparison to PyTorch, TensorFlow and/or JAX is more relevant than a comparison to CuPy/NumPy.

And then maybe also a comparison to Flashlight (https://github.com/flashlight/flashlight), xtensor (https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xtensor) or other C/C++ based ML/computing libraries?

Also, there is no mention of it, so I suppose this does not support automatic differentiation?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MatX: Efficient C++17 GPU numerical computing library wit... by cburdick13 on Wednesday October 04, 2023 @09:24AM (#37764761)

Hi, I addressed the comparisons in other comments, but in general this is for c++ users and not Python. It's more of a comparison to numPy/cuPy, and we do have a table showing the comparison in the docs.

We don't support automatic differentiation (yet).

[ Parent | on HN ]