Re:Amazon Used Secret ‘Project Nessie’ Algorithm to Raise Pr...
by svachalek on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @07:22PM
(#37758903)
How did Ford cancel the dividend without shares?
Re:Amazon Used Secret ‘Project Nessie’ Algorithm to Raise Pr...
by WrongAssumption on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @09:40PM
(#37759889)
The did have shares.
Re:Amazon Used Secret ‘Project Nessie’ Algorithm to Raise Pr...
by mulmen on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @08:32PM
(#37759461)
> In the last 20 centuries of human history the powerful have always crushed the little man with the excuse they are serving the public interest.
Was this not happening before the estimated birth of Jesus of Nazareth?
Re:Amazon Used Secret ‘Project Nessie’ Algorithm to Raise Pr...
by username332211 on Wednesday October 04, 2023 @03:08AM
(#37761816)
I was thinking more of the "people's" party of the Roman republic which replaced electoral government with divine monarchy in 27 BC. It's a rather fragrant example of what I'm describing as well as the first one I know of, but I doubt it's the first time it actually happened.
Christianity couldn't have been a tool of the rich and powerful in the first century, because it only began acquiring powerful followers around the third century crisis.
1. The Dodge brothers - minority shareholders in Ford Motors, wanted to set up their own automotive company. They planned to use the money from Ford's dividends to support their company.
2. Henry Ford would have liked to keep his monopoly on affordable cars. He cancelled the dividend and claimed he's going to spend the money on improving society (by selling the Model T even cheaper) as a thinly veiled excuse.
3. The courts in Michigan saw what's happening and forced Ford to issue dividends.
As you can see in that case case, it was the lack of shareholder primacy that enriched the powerful. In the last 20 centuries of human history the powerful have always crushed the little man with the excuse they are serving the public interest. Beware of anything that empowers powerful individuals (like corporate CEOs and directors) to take arbitrary actions in the name of "social responsibility".