I applied to 250 jobs and timed how long each one took

Re:I applied to 250 jobs and timed how long each one took by ar_lan on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @02:00PM (#37755356)

> What if there was some way to limit job seekers to e.g. 10 job applications per month, industrywide? Feels like that could cut down the noise and allow employers to consider each individual applicant more carefully.

Beyond the actual difficulty in doing this without a completely centralized hiring process, this feels incredibly immoral. People have families to feed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I applied to 250 jobs and timed how long each one took by tuatoru on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @04:11PM (#37756901)

repeat of my comment above: -

I sometimes think requiring people to telephone and navigate a voice system to get an application ID before they can apply might help.

Tiny barriers can have disproportionate effects.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I applied to 250 jobs and timed how long each one took by timmaxw on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @10:35PM (#37760200)

> People have families to feed.

People would submit fewer applications, but each individual application would have a higher chance of success, because everyone else would _also_ be submitting fewer applications. The number of job openings is the same either way, so the same number of people get hired in the end, right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I applied to 250 jobs and timed how long each one took by ar_lan on Wednesday October 04, 2023 @01:12AM (#37761065)

I don't know? I'm mostly arguing against the industry-wide comment, and thinking from the perspective of someone who has been laid off.

I think individual companies should do whatever they want (within legal bounds), but such a big overhaul just seems ripe to screw people over.

[ Parent | on HN ]