Re:Why did Objective-C never catch on? (Ask Slashdot, Aug 2000)
by conradev on Friday March 30, 2012 @07:30AM
(#3775429)
It sits directly atop C, which, for example, is why C++ is very portable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why did Objective-C never catch on? (Ask Slashdot, Aug 2000)
by dfox on Friday March 30, 2012 @09:26AM
(#3775800)
There is significant difference between C++ and Objective-C in this matter. Implementations of C++ that emit C are almost always implemented as full compilers that targets C as output language, but Objective-C can be easily implemented as quite simple preprocessor on top of C, that has almost no understanding of C's syntax. (traditional Objective-C, ie. without closures and such features)